|
scrabbleking1965 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
At 6:00 or so... "tree top areas show more CO2 is going in than coming out", HELLO. Try measure the tailpipes where those 3.5 BILLION gallons per DAY of crude oil are being burned.
kfw38C (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
For all of the accusations of skeptics that climatologists support AGW for grants, has anyone thought about Dyson's motivations? He may be a brilliant scientist, but that does not make him always right or have his own agenda.Do your homework. understand not only what people are saying, but WHY they are saying it.
Mattzz1964 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Can't he invent a big vacuum cleaner to suck the extra co2 out of the atmosphere?
MountainDeW06 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
NWO is behind the global warming bs. If there is data backing up the MAN MADE CAUSE OF GLOBAL WARMING, then I will listen. I believe that all the planets in the solar system are warming.
jazzmessenger8 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
by "GW crowd" do you mean scientists?
benjisgrill (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Yes, I'd rather not have you waste MY money on ANYTHING.
TRUMPHENT (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Dyson talks as if the Drs. Keeling never existed. The Keeling Curve begins in 1958. Svante Arrnehius calculated the greenhouse effect of CO2 and others as far back as 1896 with incredible accuracy.Computer climate models are still in their infancy but, they are designed by top tier scientists and are constantly improved.
jazzmessenger8 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Preemptive action can't hurt. I would rather waste money on preventing non-existant AGW than waste money on war, which we have done many times.
jazzmessenger8 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
okay. (first of all, those events were not global) And does this dismiss the idea of AGW? NO!
jazzmessenger8 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Please give me a credible source for this assertion. If you want, I can give you plenty of credible sources stating that AGW is real |