tvsceptic (August 10, 2008 at 11:56 pm)

i think you are the stupid fucking idiot, my friend! face the facts...this film is an appalling....looks nice though

tvsceptic (August 10, 2008 at 11:52 pm)

oh my god! what a piece of crap....beautiful cinematography (wasted on this bunkum) and an interesting story idea, but still a piece of shit at the end of the day...horrible characters and dirty hankerchief dialogue...greenaway should grow up and disappear up his own arse like the rare bird in carry on up the jungle...if you think this is art then you need therapy

TulseLuper (June 21, 2008 at 10:22 pm)

It's a little too long and repetitive, and the script is filled with profanity, which gets to be redundant and beneath Greenaway as a writer. But like all his films, the visuals are breathtaking. The love story at the center is also surprisingly moving for a Greenaway picture.

heyboy08 (June 21, 2008 at 8:53 pm)

in what ways is it flawed? just curious.

TulseLuper (June 3, 2008 at 3:58 pm)

Finally saw the film. Flawed, no doubt, but overall quite enjoyable and Greenaway's best work in a LONG time. Martin Freeman is outstanding.

TulseLuper (June 3, 2008 at 3:57 pm)

Peter Greenaway is English. Anyway, are you implying that the great Dutchman Rembrandt was bad? Hmm...

artistforrealart (April 16, 2008 at 5:48 pm)

Not enough shooting and car chasing? Oh and it misses A Sschwartzenegger too! You fucking stupid idiot!

artistforrealart (April 16, 2008 at 5:48 pm)

Not enough shooting and car chasing? Oh and it misses A Sschwartzenegger too! You fucking stupid idiot!

vanrijngo (April 6, 2008 at 2:57 pm)

What a piece! Only a Dutchman could produce something this f-n bad!Cheers!vanrijngo

se7en1976 (March 9, 2008 at 11:13 am)

the music is utter rubbish and the movie doesnt look a fig better