jogymnast (August 10, 2008 at 6:23 pm)

that was flawless!

lolkiwi91794 (July 29, 2008 at 3:54 am)

and i was afraid to do a cartwheelhahaha

481095ymg (July 3, 2008 at 4:31 am)

what was her score?

Dunntosh (June 12, 2008 at 6:50 am)

With the exception of the 1985 World Championships, when Elena Shushunova & Oksana Omelianchik tied for the gold...

tmc8802 (June 4, 2008 at 5:08 pm)

i agree it sucks that chellsie won...it goes down as the closest competition in history though, with chellsie only winning by .001

GymMaverick (June 4, 2008 at 4:07 am)

They were exactly tied, which is why they went to higher start values as the tie breaker I suppose, at least that's the only story I've ever heard. If it was a rounding 'error' I'm sure there would have been a lot more attention paid to it. I like to think of them as 'tied' though, it sucks that they gave it to Chellsie, whatever the reason.

tmc8802 (June 4, 2008 at 3:36 am)

i thought that it was a rounding "error" that cost nastia the gold...if everything had been carried out to the last decimal point and not rounded, they would've been tied. i had never heard it was related to start values...

sunoxkiissed (June 3, 2008 at 2:36 am)

absolutely AMAZING performance

PmountxGymChick (March 31, 2008 at 4:12 pm)

Oh ok! Thank you so much! :)

GymMaverick (March 31, 2008 at 1:29 am)

Chellsie had a harder SV, Start Value, on VT - 9.8 (DTY) to Nastia's 9.7 (1.5TY) - they had 10 SV's on the other events.